| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
Notice Of Motion To Compel Responses To Form Interrogatories And For Monetary Sanctions Thereon
Matter on the Law & Motion / Discovery calendar for Wednesday, September 17, 2025, Line 7. 1 - PLAINTIFF HEALTHCARE RECRUITERS INTERNATIONAL's Motion To Compel Responses To Form Interrogatories And For Monetary Sanctions Thereon [Ccp 2030.290, 2033.010, 2023.030].
Plaintiff Healthcare Recruiters International's motion to compel responses to its first set of form interrogatories and for sanctions is granted in part and denied in part.
Plaintiff served the discovery on January 22, 2025 and did not receive responses by the deadline. (Booska Dec. para. 3 & Ex. A.) Although meet and confer efforts were not required, Plaintiffs' counsel sent inquiry emails well after the deadline, in May 2025 and July 2025. (Booska Dec. para. 4 & Ex. B.) Plaintiff filed this motion on August 13, 2025. On August 15, 2025, defendant Puracath Medical Inc. served responses. (Monte Dec. para. 2.)
Discovery is supposed to be self-executing. (Sinaiko Healthcare Consulting, Inc. v. Pacific Healthcare Consultants (2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 390, 402.) On this record, the court concludes that Puracath's responses came about only because of Plaintiff's motion. This is a misuse of the discovery process and a waste of court resources.
The court denies the motion to compel responses as moot but awards the requested sanctions to Plaintiff. (See Code Civ. Proc., sections 2023.010, subd. (d) [failure to submit to an authorized method of discovery is a misuse of the discovery process], and 2030.290, subd. (c) [court "shall" award sanctions against a party who unsuccessfully opposes a motion to compel]; Rules of Court, Rule 3.1348, subd. (a) ["The court may award sanctions under the Discovery Act in favor of a party who files a motion to compel discovery, even though . . . the requested discovery was provided to the moving party after the motion was filed."]; Sinaiko, supra, 148 Cal.App.4th, at pp. 408-409 [trial court has authority to award sanctions even where discovery is served before motion is heard].) Puracath is ordered to pay $810 to Healthcare Recruiters International within 30 days of entry of this order.
For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 301 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 301 Zoom ID 161 502 4290; Passcode 700956.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept301tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.
Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept301tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.
The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion or Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(301/CVA) | |