DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC24619887·sf·Civil·Employment
Hearing 12 months agoDENIED

DESIRAE FERIA VS. SAN FRANCISCO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ET AL

Motion To Compel Matt Wayne, Kim Kelly, Christine Lee, And Danielle Houck To Appear For Deposition And Produce Documents; Request For Monetary Sanctions Against Defendant And/Or Its Counsel In The Amount Of $8,560.00

Hearing date
Aug 20, 2025
Department
301
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Discovery rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$8,560.00

Parties

PlaintiffDESIRAE FERIA
DefendantSAN FRANCISCO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

Attorneys

Aaron Gbewonyofor Plaintiff

Ruling

Matter on the Law & Motion / Discovery calendar for Wednesday, August 20, 2025, Line 5. PLAINTIFF DESIRAE FERIA's Motion To Compel Matt Wayne, Kim Kelly, Christine Lee, And Danielle Houck To Appear For Deposition And Produce Documents; Request For Monetary Sanctions Against Defendant And/Or Its Counsel In The Amount Of $8,560.00.

Plaintiff's Motion to Compel the Appearance of Matt Wayne, Kimberly Kelly, Christine Lee and Danielle Houck is denied. As to Kimberly Kelly, the motion is moot. As to the remaining individuals, Plaintiff fails to establish that she lacks other means to obtain the information she seeks, that the information she seeks is crucial to her case, and/or that the information sought is relevant and not privileged. The opposing party is to present a proposed order for the Court's review consistent with this ruling.

For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 301 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 301 Zoom ID 161 502 4290; Passcode 700956.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.

Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept301tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.

Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept301tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.

The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion or Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(301/JMT) | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share