| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
Notice Of Motion And Motion To Compel Defendant To Further Respond To Special Interrogatories, Set One, And For Monetary Sanctions Against Defendant And Its Attorneys
SF Superior Court - Law & Motion / Discovery Dept 301 - CGC24619295 - June 30, 2025 Hearing date: June 30, 2025 Case number: CGC24619295 Case title: KIM MCLAUGHLIN ET AL VS. CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO ET AL Case Number: | | CGC24619295 | Case Title: | | KIM MCLAUGHLIN ET AL VS. CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-06-30 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion To Compel Defendant To Further Respond To Special Interrogatories, Set One, And For Monetary Sanctions Against Defendant And Its Attorneys | Rulings: | | Matter on the LAW AND MOTION / DISCOVERY CALENDAR FOR MONDAY, JUN-30-2025, LINE 12.
2-PLAINTIFFS KIM MCLAUGHLIN, and GARY SPICER'S Motion To Compel Defendant To Further Respond To Special Interrogatories, Set One, And For Monetary Sanctions Against Defendant And Its Attorneys. As described in the motion to compel form interrogatory responses, the meet and confer efforts here were sufficient.
Regarding the sole Special Interrogatory at issue in this motion, the City appears to have responded with its verified response. That special interrogatory requests a date each "truncated dome" was installed. It is unclear what further response Plaintiffs want. Defendant has provided its best estimate and vows to amend responses if it discovers new facts. Therefore, the motion is denied. Both parties acted with substantial justification. Thus, the court declines to issue sanctions.
For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 301 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 301 Zoom ID 161 502 4290; Passcode 700956.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.
Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept301tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.
Counsel for the moving party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept301tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.
The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion or Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(301/JT) | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”