DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC24614651·sf·Civil·Contract
Hearing 11 months agoGRANTED in part; DENIED without prejudice as to attorney fees.

SAN FRANCISCO HEALTH CARE AND REHAB, INC, A VS. HELPING HANDS HOME HEALTH CARE & HOSPICE, INC ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion To Enforce Settlement Agreement To Get $37,150 Judgment Against Defendants Helping Hands Home Health Care & Hospice, Inc And Warren Delfin

Hearing date
Sep 11, 2025
Department
301
Judge
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$37,150$17,000$95,000$75,000$10,000

Parties

PlaintiffSAN FRANCISCO HEALTH CARE AND REHAB, INC
DefendantHELPING HANDS HOME HEALTH CARE & HOSPICE, INC
DefendantWARREN DELFIN

Attorneys

Jonathan Van Eefor Plaintiff

Ruling

Matter on the Law & Motion/Discovery Calendar for Friday, September 11, 2025, line 6, PLAINTIFF SAN FRANCISCO HEALTH CARE AND REHAB, INC, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION'S Motion To Enforce Settlement Agreement To Get $37,150 Judgment Against Defendants Helping Hands Home Health Care & Hospice, Inc And Warren Delfin That Includes Unpaid Amounts And Attorneys' Fees Of More Than $17,000 California Code Of Civil Procedure Section 664.6);

The unopposed motion by San Francisco Health Care & Rehab, Inc. (SFHCR) for entry of judgment pursuant to the terms of the settlement agreement, attached as Exhibit A to the Van Ee declaration, is granted. The parties settled for a payment of $95,000 by defendants Helping Hands Home Health Care & Hospice, Inc. and Warren Delfin to SFHCR in installments. Helping Hands and Delfin have paid $75,000 but their last two installments of $10,000 are past due. The court orders that judgment be entered against Helping Hands and Delfin jointly and severally in favor of SFHCR, plus costs.

SFHCR asks that the judgment include interest and attorneys' fees. There is no provision for prejudgment interest in the settlement agreement that SFHCR cites, but prejudgment interest accrues at 10% per annum from the date of breach by statute (Civ. Code, sec. 3287, 3289), and the court concludes that the date when each installment was due is a date certain from which interest should accrue.

With respect to attorneys' fees, the settlement agreement states at page 5, "the judgment will accrue reasonable attorneys' fees incurred to enforce the judgment." The Van Ee declaration states a total amount of fees of $17,000 but provides no information from which the court may conclude the amount is reasonable and no basis for a lodestar calculation. The request for that amount is denied without prejudice. SFHCR may file a motion for attorneys' fees. SFHCR shall prepare a proposed judgment consistent with this order and submit it to defendants pursuant to Rule of Court 3.1312.

For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 301 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 301 Zoom ID 161 502 4290; Passcode 700956.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.

Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept301tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.

Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept301tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.

The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion or Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. = (302/CVA) | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share