DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CMCV01270·la·Civil·Discovery Dispute
Hearing in 5 daysDENIED

Not stated v. District

Motion to compel further responses to form interrogatories

Hearing date
Sep 8, 2026
Department
A
Judge
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffPlaintiff
DefendantDistrict

Ruling

(Compton Courthouse: Dept. A) September 8, 2026 DEPARTMENT A LAW AND MOTION RULINGS INSTRUCTIONS: If the parties wish to submit on the tentative ruling and avoid a court appearance on the matter, the moving party must: 1. Contact the opposing party and all other parties who have appeared in the action and confirm that each will submit on the tentative ruling.

2. No later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing, call the Courtroom (310-761-4302) advising that all parties will submit on the tentative ruling and waive hearing; and 3. Serve notice of the Court's ruling on all parties entitled to receive service. If this procedure is followed, when the case is called the Court will enter its ruling on the motion in accordance with its tentative ruling. If any party declines to submit on the tentative ruling, then no telephone call is necessary, and all parties should appear at the hearing. If there is neither a telephone call nor an appearance, then the matter may either be taken off calendar or ruled on. TENTATIVE RULINGS -- http://www.lacourt.org/tentativeRulingNet/u i/main.aspx’casetype=civil

to compel further responses to form interrogatories. The motion fails to comply with CRC rule 3.1345, subd. (c). by failing to provide the text of District's discovery responses verbatim in the supporting separate statement, instead summarizing the responses. It appears to the court that District has fully complied with the requests by serving compliant responses rendering the motion moot except as to sanctions. Based Plaintiff's failure to comply with rule 3.1345, the court declines to award plaintiff monetary sanctions. Plaintiff is ordered to give notice. Case Number: 26CMCV01203 Hearing Date: September 8, 2026 Dept: A SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - SOUTH CENTRAL DISTRICT WSAV ARTESIA OWNER IX, L.P, Plaintiff, vs. QUALITY SERVICE TRUCKING, INC., Defendant. |)))))))))))))))

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share