CP CLEMENT, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY VS. DOE 1 ET AL
Notice Of Motion And Motion To Quash Deposition Subpoena And Deposition Notice Or, In The Alternaitve, To Modify; For Protective Order; And For Monetary Sanctions Against Plaintiff And Its Counsel
Motion type
Parties
Attorneys
Ruling
Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for September 2, 2026. Line 10. DEFENDANT DAVID SILVERMAN (NON-PARTY) Notice Of Motion And Motion To Quash Deposition Subpoena And Deposition Notice Or, In The Alternaitve, To Modify; For Protective Order; And For Monetary Sanctions Against Plaintiff And Its Counsel is OFF CALENDAR.
Notice of motion on file states a different hearing date than the courtesy copy provided to the court. The hearing date on the document on file appears to have been altered by hand at the time of filing, and it appears the proof of service was filed at the same time, indicating that the document may have been altered after it was served. As such, the proof of service on file does not appear to reflect that the papers on file were served. =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”