DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD26682209·sf·Civil·Real Property / Housing
Hearing todayOFF CALENDAR

CP CLEMENT, LLC VS. DAVID SILVERMAN ET AL

Motion Of David Silverman To Enforce The July 20, 2026 Discovery Sanctions (Code Civ. Proc. 177.5. 2023.010, 2023.030, 2023.040)

Hearing date
Sep 2, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffCP CLEMENT, LLC
DefendantDAVID SILVERMAN

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for September 2, 2026. Line 9. DEFENDANT DAVID SILVERMAN Motion Of David Silverman To Enforce The July 20, 2026 Discovery Sanctions (Code Civ. Proc. 177.5. 2023.010, 2023.030, 2023.040); Memorandum Of Points And Authorities; Declaration Of David Silverman is OFF CALENDAR. Insufficient notice of the original September 1, 2026 hearing date per CCP 1170.8 and 1010.6. Notice of motion on file states a different hearing date than the courtesy copy provided to the court.

The hearing date on the courtesy copy provided to the court appears to have been altered by hand, so it is unclear what date was on the copies served. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share