DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
201900536583CLCL·ventura·Civil·Banking/Debt Collection
Hearing todayCONTINUED

Wells Fargo Bank NA vs. Jerzeth Fisher

Motion to Vacate

Hearing date
Sep 2, 2026
Department
40
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Oct 5, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffWells Fargo Bank NA
DefendantJerzeth Fisher

Ruling

201900536583CLCL: Wells Fargo Bank NA vs. Jerzeth Fisher 09/02/2026 in Department 40 Motion to Vacate

Tentative Ruling: The Court continues the hearing to October 5, 2026 at 8:20AM to allow Plaintiff time to properly serve the motion and related documents on opposing counsel. The proofs of service submitted by Plaintiff are not compliant because they fail to include required information and they are executed by Plaintiff.

Per CCP 1013a: An affidavit setting forth the exact title of the document served and filed in the cause, showing the name and residence or business address of the person making the service, showing that he or she is a resident of or employed in the county where the mailing occurs, that he or she is over the age of 18 years and not a party to the cause, and showing the date and place of deposit in the mail, the name and address of the person served as shown on the envelope, and also showing that the envelope was sealed and deposited in the mail with the postage thereon fully prepaid.

It is also unclear whether Plaintiff served counsel of record for the opposing party or why he has served the individuals identified on his proof of service. Plaintiff shall correct all service issues and ensure the proper individuals have been served. Code-compliant proofs of service must be filed with the court no later than September 11, 2026. Plaintiff shall also give notice of the continued hearing date, with proper proof of service attached.

1

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share