Wells Fargo Bank, NA v Ashley E. Ayala
Motion for Summary Judgment
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
TENTATIVE RULING FOR JULY 13, 2026 Department R12 - Judge Kory Mathewson Wells Fargo Bank, NA v Ashley E. Ayala – CIVRS2508685 Motion: Summary Judgment Movant: Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Respondent: Defendant Ashley E. Ayala Ruling: Motion for Summary Judgment is CONTINUED to 8/12/2026, 9AM, R12. ______________________________________________________________________________
Defendant’s opposing separate statement refers to Defendant’s declaration filed in opposition to the motion, and the reply papers also suggest Defendant may have filed evidentiary objections under separate cover. However, neither Defendant’s declaration nor her evidentiary objections are scanned into Enterprise Justice and have not been properly filed with the Court. For these reasons, the Court continues the hearing and orders Defendant to file these documents forthwith.
Dated: July 13, 2026
____________________________ Judge Kory Mathewson
1
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”