DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC25277277·sf·Civil·Asbestos Litigation
Hearing 11 months agoDENIED

JOHN SHANNON ET AL VS. CARRIER CORPORATION ET AL

Motion for Summary Judgment

Hearing date
Sep 30, 2025
Department
304
Judge
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Summary Judgment rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffJOHN SHANNON
DefendantCARRIER CORPORATION
DefendantViking Pump, Inc.

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Asbestos Law & Motion - CGC25277277 - September 30, 2025 Hearing date: September 30, 2025 Case number: CGC25277277 Case title: JOHN SHANNON ET AL VS. CARRIER CORPORATION ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25277277 | Case Title: | | JOHN SHANNON ET AL VS. CARRIER CORPORATION ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-09-30 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT | Rulings: | | On Asbestos Law and Motion Calendar for Tuesday, September 30, 2025, in Department 304, Line 1.

Defendant Viking Pump, Inc.'s ("Defendant" or "Viking") Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. Opposition filed. Reply filed. Defendant fails to sustain its initial burden of showing Plaintiffs do not possess and cannot reasonably obtain needed evidence of exposure to asbestos-containing materials supplied by Defendant. (Aguilar v. Atl. Richfield Co. (2001) 25 Cal.4th 826, 855.)

*Complete tentative ruling has been electronically served to Counsel. Any party wishing to contest the tentative ruling must email contestasbestostr@sftc.org by 4:00 p.m. on the day before the hearing and state their intention to contest. If a hearing is requested, it will be on September 30, 2025, at 9:00 a.m in Department 304.

Attorneys may appear in person or remotely via zoom: Meeting ID 160 757 8308; Passcode: 485029. Face coverings are optional.

The Court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law and Motion department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: Their name, CSR and telephone number, and their individual work email address. There will be only one official record. If the parties cannot agree, the Court will designate a qualified court reporter to provide the official transcript for the matter, and the party or parties will bear the cost. = (304/EPS). | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share