DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC23277168·sf·Civil·Asbestos
Hearing 12 months agoDENIED

HAZEL HAASE ET AL VS. RILEY POWER INC ET AL

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Hearing date
Sep 2, 2025
Department
304
Judge
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Summary Judgment rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffHAZEL HAASE
DefendantRILEY POWER INC
DefendantF.P LATHROP CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Asbestos Law & Motion - CGC23277168 - September 2, 2025 Hearing date: September 2, 2025 Case number: CGC23277168 Case title: HAZEL HAASE ET AL VS. RILEY POWER INC ET AL Case Number: | | CGC23277168 | Case Title: | | HAZEL HAASE ET AL VS. RILEY POWER INC ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-09-02 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT - Hearing Date Corrected | Rulings: | | On Asbestos Law and Motion Calendar for Tuesday, September 2, 2025, in Department 304, Line 1 Defendant F.P Lathrop Construction Company's ("Defendant" or "Lathrop") Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. Opposition filed. Reply filed.

*Complete tentative ruling has been electronically served to Counsel The tentative was issued by Judge East and any party wishing to contest the tentative ruling must email contestasbestostr@sftc.org by 4:00 p.m. on Friday, August 29, 2025, and state their intention to contest.

If a hearing is requested, it will be on September 2, 2025, at 9:00 a.m in Department 206. Attorneys may appear in person in Department 206 or remotely via zoom: Meeting ID: 161 085 3547; Passcode: 902179. Face coverings are optional.

The Court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law and Motion department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: Their name, CSR and telephone number, and their individual work email address. There will be only one official record. If the parties cannot agree, the Court will designate a qualified court reporter to provide the official transcript for the matter, and the party or parties will bear the cost. =(REAST/206). | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share