DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD25679813·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 11 months agoOFF CALENDAR per the request of the moving party.

CLAYTON HOTEL LLC VS. NERMIN WISA ET AL

Demurrer to Complaint

Hearing date
Oct 7, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffCLAYTON HOTEL LLC
DefendantNERMIN WISA

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25679813 - October 7, 2025 Hearing date: October 7, 2025 Case number: CUD25679813 Case title: CLAYTON HOTEL LLC VS. NERMIN WISA ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25679813 | Case Title: | | CLAYTON HOTEL LLC VS. NERMIN WISA ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-10-07 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | DEMURRER to COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion calendar for October 7, 2025, line 7. Defendant's Demurrer to Complaint is OFF CALENDAR per the request of the moving party. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom [Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252].

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share