| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
Notice Of Motion, Motion, Memorandum Of Points And Authorities, And Declaration In Support Of Motion To Vacate Default And Judgment
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25679799 - November 18, 2025 Hearing date: November 18, 2025 Case number: CUD25679799 Case title: DELAWARE LAKEWOOD APARTMENTS, LLC VS. HOWARD BARNES ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25679799 | Case Title: | | DELAWARE LAKEWOOD APARTMENTS, LLC VS. HOWARD BARNES ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-11-18 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion, Motion, Memorandum Of Points And Authorities, And Declaration In Support Of Motion To Vacate Default And Judgment |
Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for November 18, 2025. Line 13. DEFENDANT HOWARD BARNES Motion To Vacate Default And Judgment; is GRANTED. Plaintiff's untimely opposition is stricken. The default of Defendant Howard Barnes is set aside. The default judgment entered on October 10, 2025 is vacated. The writ issued on October 23, 2025 is recalled. Defendant Howard Barnes shall file and serve the proposed answer within five days. =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”