DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD25679041·sf·Civil·Real Property / Housing
Hearing 10 months agoHEARING REQUIRED

GAETANI REAL ESTATE VS. GLENDA VARGAS RODRIGUEZ ET AL

Motion To Withdraw Or Amend Admissions Deemed Admitted For Failure To Respond

Hearing date
Oct 14, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffGAETANI REAL ESTATE
DefendantGLENDA VARGAS RODRIGUEZ

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25679041 - October 14, 2025 Hearing date: October 14, 2025 Case number: CUD25679041 Case title: GAETANI REAL ESTATE VS. GLENDA VARGAS RODRIGUEZ ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25679041 | Case Title: | | GAETANI REAL ESTATE VS. GLENDA VARGAS RODRIGUEZ ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-10-14 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Motion To Withdraw Or Amend Admissions Deemed Admitted For Failure To Respond | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for October 14, 2025. Line 10. DEFENDANT GLENDA RODRIGUEZ Motion To Withdraw Or Amend Admissions Deemed Admitted For Failure To Respond

HEARING REQUIRED to address (1) whether, how, and by whom the moving papers were served; and (2) whether and how the defendant, who does not read or write English, can competently attest under penalty of perjury to the truth of the contents of her declaration, which is written exclusively in English. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share