| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
Notice Of Motion And Motion For Reconsideration Of Order Denying Motion To Vacate
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25678212 - November 20, 2025 Hearing date: November 20, 2025 Case number: CUD25678212 Case title: DEMAS YAN VS. CHUNLEI LIU Case Number: | | CUD25678212 | Case Title: | | DEMAS YAN VS. CHUNLEI LIU | Court Date: | | 2025-11-20 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion For Reconsideration Of Order Denying Motion To Vacate | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for November 20, 2025. Line 9.
DEFENDANT CHUNLEI LIU Motion For Reconsideration Of Order Denying Motion To Vacate; is DENIED. Defendant does not offer any new or different facts, circumstances, or law, which could not have been presented at the time of Defendant's original motion.
The Court notes that the earlier August 25, 2025 order denying Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment did not dispose of any issues in this case, but simply allowed the matter to proceed to trial on September 15, 2025, which Defendant failed to attend. =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”