DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
202300575263PRGE·ventura·Probate·Probate
Hearing todayNo appearance necessary re: OSC; continued for supplemental documents.

In the Matter of Sara Belle Targum

Court’s Order to Show Cause re: Failure to File 2nd Account and Report

Hearing date
Sep 1, 2026
Department
J6
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Dec 1, 2026
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$6,737.01$6,639.50$11,844.55$12,030.27

Ruling

202300575263PRGE: In the Matter of Sara Belle Targum 09/01/2026 in Department J6 Court's Order to Show Cause re: Failure to File 2nd Account and Report for the period of 04/30/24 through 04/29/26

The Court finds that the Second and Final Account for 4/30/24 through 4/29/26 was filed on 7/14/26. No appearance necessary re: OSC for failure to find Second Account for 4/30/24 through 4/29/26.

Account and Report Issues: 1. Schedule D show check paid on 9/12/25 for Attorney’s Fees in the amount of $6,737.01. Court order on 8/20/24 authorized only $6,639.50 for attorney fees.

2. GC-400(SUM) not included as required by California Rules of Court, rule 7.575(e)(5).

3. Assets on Hand at close lists Carry Value of Schedule G as $11,844.55 and Market Value of $12,030.27. Account statement shows closing balance of $12,030.27. No Schedule G attached. Unclear from Morgan Stanley statement what is the basis for difference?

4. Attorney’s Fees: No paralegal statement as required by California Rules of Court, rule 7.702(e).

Court to address issues at hearing.

Continue to 12/1/26 at 9:00 AM in J6 for verified supplemental documents to be filed re: unresolved issues.

1

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share