DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
202100556042PRCP·ventura·Probate·Probate
Hearing todayOSC re: Surcharge taken off calendar; Final Account and Report hearing scheduled for 11/24/26; Court intends to approve the petition for Account and Report

In The Matter of Jason Elmer G. Tuazon

Court’s Order to Show Cause re: Termination and Final Accounting; OSC re: Surcharge

Hearing date
Sep 1, 2026
Department
J6
Judge
Prevailing
Moving Party
Next hearing
Nov 24, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

OtherJason Elmer G. Tuazon
PetitionerDexter Tuazon
PetitionerGrace Tuazon
OtherEdwin G. Tuazon
OtherEdna
OtherHenry

Ruling

202100556042PRCP: In The Matter of Jason Elmer G. Tuazon 09/01/2026 in Department J6 Court's Order to Show Cause re: Termination and Final Accounting

The Court intends to take the OSC re: Surcharge off the calendar.

With respect to the OSC Re: Termination and Final Account, the Court notes that on 7/21/26 petitioners filed a Final Account and Report. The Court schedules the hearing on the Final Account and Report for 11/24/26 at 9:00 AM in Ct. J6 and orders conservators to give notice. Conservators to file a supplement per Probate Code 2631(a).

The petition lists conservatee’s surviving relatives as his five siblings, two of which (Dexter and Grace) are the co-conservators. The Court notes that the investigator’s report states that conservatee’s brother Edwin G. Tuazon is deceased. The Court notes that conservatee’s surviving siblings, Edna and Henry, have submitted statements in support of the conservators and approving of their expenses and have been notified of this hearing.

The Court intends to approve the petition for Account and Report Third Account and Report from 12/7/24 through 12/14/25.

1

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share