DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC25628073·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing 9 months agoOFF CALENDAR. First Amended Complaint on file.

JULIE EVARKIOU VS. SF MULTIFAMILY POOLS 2-3 (B) OWNER LLC ET AL

DEMURRER to COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Nov 13, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffJULIE EVARKIOU
DefendantSF MULTIFAMILY POOLS 2-3 (B) OWNER LLC
DefendantDANIEL GAENSLEN
DefendantMISSION ROCK RESIDENTIAL CALIFORNIA, INC.

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC25628073 - November 13, 2025 Hearing date: November 13, 2025 Case number: CGC25628073 Case title: JULIE EVARKIOU VS. SF MULTIFAMILY POOLS 2-3 (B) OWNER LLC ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25628073 | Case Title: | | JULIE EVARKIOU VS. SF MULTIFAMILY POOLS 2-3 (B) OWNER LLC ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-11-13 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | DEMURRER to COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for November 13, 2025. Line 6.

DEFENDANT DANIEL GAENSLEN AN INDIVIDUAL, SF MULTIFAMILY POOLS 2-3 (B) OWNER LLC, MISSION ROCK RESIDENTIAL CALIFORNIA, INC. DEMURRER to COMPLAINT is OFF CALENDAR. First Amended Complaint on file. =(501/REQ)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share