KARENA APPLE FENG VS. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ET AL
Motion For Reconsideration And Motion To Vacate Judgment Based On Ada Violation
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC25625318 - November 5, 2025 Hearing date: November 5, 2025 Case number: CGC25625318 Case title: KARENA APPLE FENG VS. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25625318 | Case Title: | | KARENA APPLE FENG VS. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-11-05 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Motion For Reconsideration And Motion To Vacate Judgment Based On Ada Violation | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for November 5, 2025 line 5.
PLAINTIFF KARENA FENG'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF MOTION TO VACATE JUDGMENT BASED ON ADA VIOLATION is OFF CALENDAR. Insufficient notice CCP 1005 and 1010.6. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom [Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252]. Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”