DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC26632835·sf·Civil·Civil
Hearing todayDENIED

MARK MAJOR VS. MR. BRANDON RILEY

DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Sep 1, 2026
Department
220
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffMARK MAJOR
DefendantMR. BRANDON RILEY

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Law & Motion / Discovery Dept 301 - CGC26632835 - September 1, 2026 Hearing date: September 1, 2026 Case number: CGC26632835 Case title: MARK MAJOR VS. MR. BRANDON RILEY Case Number: | | CGC26632835 | Case Title: | | MARK MAJOR VS. MR. BRANDON RILEY | Court Date: | | 2026-09-01 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | On the Law & Motion/Discovery calendar for September 1, 2026, line 4. DEFENDANT MR. BRANDON RILEY CEO OF SF SUPERIOR COURT'S DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT.

This matter is transferred to be heard in Department 220 at 10am by Judge Treat on the same date. Judge Van Aken is recused. Judge Treat's tentative ruling is as follows: Defendant Brandon Riley's demurrer to Plaintiff Mark Major's second amended complaint (SAC) is denied without leave to amend.

For this 10:00 a.m. hearing, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 220 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 220 Zoom ID 161 4867 3008; Passcode 803457.) To appear remotely at the hearing, enter the Zoom ID and Passcode in your Zoom application. Hearing may also be joined by telephone by dialing +1 669 254 5252 and entering the meeting ID and password.

Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept301tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.

Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept301tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.

The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion or Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(301/VJ) | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share