DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC24615091·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 11 months agoGRANTED

SUSAN BOONE VS. ANGELA Y. CHEER ET AL

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO File A First Amended Complaint For Damages

Hearing date
Oct 6, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffSUSAN BOONE
DefendantANGELA Y. CHEER

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC24615091 - October 6, 2025 Hearing date: October 6, 2025 Case number: CGC24615091 Case title: SUSAN BOONE VS. ANGELA Y. CHEER ET AL Case Number: | | CGC24615091 | Case Title: | | SUSAN BOONE VS. ANGELA Y. CHEER ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-10-06 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR LEAVE TO File A First Amended Complaint For Damages | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion calendar for October 6, 2025, line 3. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint is GRANTED.

First Amended Complaint to be filed and served forthwith. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom [Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252]. Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share