DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC24612995·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 9 months agoGRANTED with final leave to amend

BEN PATRIACCA VS. BONNIE SPINDLER ET AL

MOTION TO STRIKE Amended COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Nov 20, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Strike rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffBEN PATRIACCA
DefendantBONNIE SPINDLER
DefendantCORCORAN GROUP LLC

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC24612995 - November 20, 2025 Hearing date: November 20, 2025 Case number: CGC24612995 Case title: BEN PATRIACCA VS. BONNIE SPINDLER ET AL Case Number: | | CGC24612995 | Case Title: | | BEN PATRIACCA VS. BONNIE SPINDLER ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-11-20 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION TO STRIKE Amended COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for November 20, 2025. Line 3.2. DEFENDANT CORCORAN GROUP LLC MOTION TO STRIKE Amended COMPLAINT is GRANTED with final leave to amend. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share