DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC22601188·sf·Civil·Real Property / Housing
Hearing 10 months agoOff calendar. Insufficient notice per CCP 1005 and CCP 1010.6.

ANGELEA ROMBEIRO VS. JESSICA WRIGHT ET AL

MOTION FROM PANZER DEFENSE RESPONSE; EMERGENCY MOTION; REQUEST FOR MSC; REQUEST FOR APPOINTED COUNSEL; REQUEST FOR LENIENCY

Hearing date
Oct 9, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffANGELEA ROMBEIRO
DefendantJESSICA WRIGHT

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC22601188 - October 9, 2025 Hearing date: October 9, 2025 Case number: CGC22601188 Case title: ANGELEA ROMBEIRO VS. JESSICA WRIGHT ET AL Case Number: | | CGC22601188 | Case Title: | | ANGELEA ROMBEIRO VS. JESSICA WRIGHT ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-10-09 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FROM PANZER DEFENSE RESPONSE; EMERGENCY MOTION; DECLARATION IN SUPPORT; REQUEST FOR MSC; REQUEST FOR APPOINTED COUNSEL; REQUEST FOR LENIENCY AND PROPOSED ORDER | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Motion calendar for October 9, 2025, line 9.

PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FROM PANZER DEFENSE RESPONSE; EMERGENCY MOTION; REQUEST FOR MSC; REQUEST FOR APPOINTED COUNSEL; REQUEST FOR LENIENCY is Off calendar. Insufficient notice per CCP 1005 and CCP 1010.6. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom [Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252]. Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share