| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT , Or In The Alternative, Summary Adjudication
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC20586851 - October 10, 2025 Hearing date: October 10, 2025 Case number: CGC20586851 Case title: MALCOLM DRILLING COMPANY, INC. VS. SWINERTON WEBCOR ET AL Case Number: | | CGC20586851 | Case Title: | | MALCOLM DRILLING COMPANY, INC. VS. SWINERTON WEBCOR ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-10-10 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, Or In The Alternative, Summary Adjudication | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Motion calendar for October 10, 2025, line 1.
Cross Defendant Swinerton Webcor JV's Motion for Summary Judgment, or in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication is DENIED. Motion for Summary Adjudication is DENIED. Moving party failed to comply with CRC 3.1351(b). Compare Notice of Motion and Separate Statement. Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. Multiple triable issues of fact exist. See Haitong's response to moving party's separate statement and moving party's response to Haitong's additional facts. =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom [Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252]. Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”