DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CU24-08890·solano·Civil·Minor's Compromise
Hearing todayApproved in part, and denied in part

E. ROE v. ALTERNATIVE FAMILY SERVICES, et al.

Petition for Approval of Compromise of Claim or Action or Disposition of Proceeds of Judgment for Minor or Person with a Disability

Hearing date
Sep 1, 2026
Department
THREE
Prevailing
Mixed

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffE. ROE
DefendantALTERNATIVE FAMILY SERVICES

Ruling

Case No. CU24-08890

Petition for Approval of Compromise of Claim or Action or Disposition of Proceeds of Judgment for Minor or Person with a Disability

The Minor’s Compromise is approved in part, and denied in part. All components of the proposal are acceptable and approved with the exception of the request for Plaintiff attorney fees.

Plaintiff counsel has requested an allocation of 40% of the gross settlement amount for its fees in this matter. This is not justified by the work required by the case and far exceeds the customary fee of 25% that is almost always apportioned for legal representation of minors. Therefore, the court denies this portion of the minors compromise request. It may be modified to reflect an allocation for plaintiff attorney fees of not more than 28%, at which time the court will approve the document in its entirety.

ANATOLIY LEBEDINSKIY v. PATRICK JOHN BOAL and JUAN MORALES PEREZ

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share