Diaz v Lopez
Motion to compel discovery
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
25VECV05163 Diaz v Lopez Tentative ruling: Plaintiff's motion to compel discovery Request for Admissions: GRANT. Defendant Defendant Hector Lopez is to serve verified (under oath) further answers the request for admissions nos. 3, 5, 16, 23, 24, 33, 37, 38 23, 24, without objection, by ____. Form Interrogatories: GRANT Defendant Hector Lopez is to serve verified answers to Interrogatory 17.1 without objection as to each Request for Admission nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8-33, 35-40, 43 and 46 (example) 17.1 (a) RFA 1 (b) (c) (d) (a) RFA 2 (b) (c) (d) etc.
Defendant Hector Lopez is to serve verified answers to Interrogatory 15.1 without objection by _____. Request for Production of Documents: GRANT. Defendant Hector Lope is to serve verified responses without objection and production of the documents requested by ______. Special Interrogatories: GRANT. Defendant Hector Lopez is to serve verified (under oath) answers to the special interrogatories, without objection, by ____. IT IS SO ORDERED. CLERK TO GIVE NOTICE. | Home -->
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”