WELLS FARGO BANK, NA vs JULIE A CHEN, AN INDIVIDUAL
Request to vacate judgment
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
The Order Dismissing this action pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6 is set aside. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and against Defendant Cinthia Urzua for the remaining sum of $3,800.00 plus court costs of $315.00, for a total judgment of $4,115.00. The Proposed Judgment will be signed by the Court. Plaintiff to give notice.
BANK, NA vs JULIE A CHEN, AN INDIVIDUAL Tentative Ruling: The Court has read and considered the moving papers filed by Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Plaintiff"), the supporting declaration, and all relevant court records.
In its motion, Plaintiff requests to vacate the Judgment entered by the Court on July 1, 2026 and dismiss the action without prejudice. Plaintiff has presented evidence that Defendant Julie A. Chen ("Defendant") filed for bankruptcy on June 29, 2026. Plaintiff learned of the bankruptcy on or about July 14, 2026.
Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Sec. 473(d), the Court may set aside any void judgment or order. Code of Civil Procedure Sec. 128 also grants jurisdiction to the Court to take appropriate action in the interests of justice. Based on the declaration submitted by Plaintiff, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff's request to vacate the Judgment. Accordingly, the Judgment entered against Defendant on July 1, 2026 is vacated. The Court further orders that the Complaint filed by Plaintiff and against Defendant is DISMISSED without prejudice. Plaintiff to give notice.
Case Number: 26NWLC06078 Hearing Date: August 31, 2026 Dept: Y 26NWLC06078: CAPITAL ONE N.A. vs MARIA L ESPINOZA Tentative Ruling: The Court has read and considered the moving papers filed by Plaintiff Capital One, N.A. ("Plaintiff"), including the declaration of counsel.
The Court finds that Plaintiff mailed Requests for Admission (RFA) to counsel for Defendant on April 3, 2026, and provided proof of service by mail. Plaintiff did not receive any responses from Defendant. Plaintiff mailed its Motion to Deem Requests for Admission Admitted to counsel for Defendant on July 23, 2026, and provided proof of service by mail. The address for Defendant on both proofs of service match the address that is listed on the Answer.
Having considered the moving papers, Plaintiff's Motion to Deem Requests for Admission Admitted is GRANTED. Plaintiff to give notice. | Home -->)" -->
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”