WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A vs CINTHIA URZUA, AN INDIVIDUAL
Motion for Judgment
Motion type
Monetary amounts referenced
Parties
Ruling
(Norwalk Courthouse: Dept. Y) August 31, 2026 DEPARTMENT Y LAW AND MOTION RULINGS
CHASE BANK, N.A. vs CHRISTINA A GUTIERREZ Tentative Ruling: The Court has read and reviewed the moving papers filed by Plaintiff JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. ("Plaintiff"), including the supporting declaration. The Court takes judicial notice of the Stipulation Agreement; Jurisdiction Retained Under Code of Civil Procedure Section 664.6 signed by Defendant on November 25, 2024 and filed with the Court on March 19, 2026. The Court also takes judicial notice of the Order on Settlement Agreement and Stipulation for Judgment entered by the Court on March 27, 2026. The Court notes that Plaintiff has advised that Defendant has made payments totaling $3,108.00, leaving an outstanding amount of $3,086.98 due and owing.
Based on the Stipulation signed by the parties and the moving papers submitted by Plaintiff, Plaintiff's motion is GRANTED. The Order dismissing this action pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6 is set aside. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiff JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and against Defendant Christina Gutierrez for the principal balance of $6,194.98, less credits of $3,108.00, plus court costs of zero, for a total judgment of $3,086.98. The Proposed Judgment will be signed by the Court. Plaintiff to give notice. Case Number: 24NWLC53626 Hearing Date: August 31, 2026 Dept: Y
24NWLC53626: CROWN ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC vs MICHELLE CASTELAN Tentative Ruling: The Court has read and reviewed the moving papers filed by Plaintiff Crown Asset Management, LLC ("Plaintiff"), including the supporting declaration. The Court takes judicial notice of the Settlement Agreement With Mutual Release And Stipulation For Entry of Judgment ("Stipulation") signed by Defendant on or about January 22, 2026 and filed with the Court on June 26, 2026 with the moving papers. No opposition has been filed by Defendant. The Court notes that Plaintiff has advised that Defendant has made payments totaling $600.00, leaving an outstanding amount of $10,775.15 due and owing.
Based on the Stipulation signed by the parties and the moving papers submitted by Plaintiff, Plaintiff's motion is GRANTED. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiff Crown Asset Management, LLC and against Defendant Michele Castelan for damages in the principal amount of $10,775.15, plus costs of $615.32, or a total judgment of $11,390.47. The Proposed Judgment will be signed by the Court. Plaintiff to give notice. Case Number: 24NWLC55814 Hearing Date: August 31, 2026 Dept: Y
24NWLC55814: WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A vs CINTHIA URZUA, AN INDIVIDUAL Tentative Ruling: The Court has read and reviewed the moving papers filed by Plaintiff Wells Fargo, N.A. ("Plaintiff"). The Court takes judicial notice of the Stipulation Agreement; Jurisdiction Retained Under Code of Civil Procedure Section 664.6 signed by Defendant on May 28, 2025 and filed with the Court on August 1, 2025. The Court also takes judicial notice of the Order on Settlement Agreement and Stipulation for Judgment entered by the Court on August 15, 2025. The Court also notes that Plaintiff has advised that Defendant has made payments totaling $2,311.56, leaving an outstanding amount of $3,800.00 due and owing.
Based on the Stipulation signed by the parties and the moving papers submitted by Plaintiff, Plaintiff's motion is GRANTED. The Order Dismissing this action pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6 is set aside. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and against Defendant Cinthia Urzua for the remaining sum of $3,800.00 plus court costs of $315.00, for a total judgment of $4,115.00. The Proposed Judgment will be signed by the Court. Plaintiff to give notice. Case Number: 25NWLC57014 Hearing Date: August 31, 2026 Dept: Y
25NWLC57014: WELLS FARGO BANK, NA vs JULIE A CHEN, AN INDIVIDUAL Tentative Ruling: The Court has read and considered the moving papers filed by Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Plaintiff"), the supporting declaration, and all relevant court records. In its motion, Plaintiff requests to vacate the Judgment entered by the Court on July 1, 2026 and dismiss the action without prejudice. Plaintiff has presented evidence that Defendant Julie A. Chen ("Defendant") filed for bankruptcy on June 29, 2026. Plaintiff learned of the bankruptcy on or about July 14, 2026. Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Sec. 473(d), the Court may set aside any void judgment or order. Code of Civil Procedure Sec. 128 also grants jurisdiction to the Court to take appropriate action in the interests of justice.
Based on the declaration submitted by Plaintiff, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff's request to vacate the Judgment. Accordingly, the Judgment entered against Defendant on July 1, 2026 is vacated. The Court further orders that the Complaint filed by Plaintiff and against Defendant is DISMISSED without prejudice. Plaintiff to give notice. Case Number: 26NWLC06078 Hearing Date: August 31, 2026 Dept: Y
26NWLC06078: CAPITAL ONE N.A. vs MARIA L ESPINOZA Tentative Ruling: The Court has read and considered the moving papers filed by Plaintiff Capital One, N.A. ("Plaintiff"), including the declaration of counsel. The Court finds that Plaintiff mailed Requests for Admission (RFA) to counsel for Defendant on April 3, 2026, and provided proof of service by mail. Plaintiff did not receive any responses from Defendant. Plaintiff mailed its Motion to Deem Requests for Admission Admitted to counsel for Defendant on July 23, 2026, and provided proof of service by mail. The address for Defendant on both proofs of service match the address that is listed on the Answer.
Having considered the moving papers, Plaintiff's Motion to Deem Requests for Admission Admitted is GRANTED. Plaintiff to give notice. | Home -->)" -->
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”