WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. vs MARIA E LEYVA

Stipulation for Judgment entered by the Court on January 6, 2026.

The Court notes that Plaintiff has advised that Defendant has made payments totaling $1,200.00, leaving an outstanding amount of $3,130.00 due and owing.

Based on the Stipulation signed by the parties and the moving papers submitted by Plaintiff, Plaintiff's motion is GRANTED. The Order Dismissing this action pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6 is set aside. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiff Capital One, N.A. and against Defendant Arasely Castro for the principal sum of $3,130.00 plus court costs of $583.61, for a total judgment of $3,713.61. The Proposed Judgment will be signed by the Court. Plaintiff to give notice.

BANK, N.A. vs MARIA E LEYVA Tentative Ruling: The Court has read and considered all moving documents filed by Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Plaintiff") in support of its motion for summary judgment, including the separate statement and supporting evidence.

Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment was filed on May 18, 2026 and set for hearing on August 18, 2026. No opposition has been filed by Defendant Maria E. Leyva ("Defendant").

The Court finds that Plaintiff has met the initial burden of showing that there are no defenses to its cause of action for breach of contract by proving each element of the cause of action entitling Plaintiff to summary judgment. Plaintiff has shown, through admissible evidence, that Defendant was issued the subject credit card by Plaintiff; Defendant was the only person authorized to make charges on the account; Defendant received monthly statements for the account; and there is no record of any unresolved disputes on the account. (Plaintiff's Separate Statement of Undisputed Material Facts ("UMF") Nos. 1-9.)

The evidence further shows Defendant's last payment on the account was on April 18, 2024 in the amount of $200.00, and Defendant owes Plaintiff an unpaid balance of $20,897.32 on the credit account. (Id., UMF Nos. 10-12.)

The burden having shifted to Defendant, the Court finds Defendant has failed to set forth specific facts showing that a triable issue of material fact exists as to any of the elements of the causes of action for breach of contract or that there is any defense thereto required by Code of Civil Procedure section 437c(p)(1).

The Court finds that Plaintiff is entitled to judgment as a matter of law and GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment as to its cause of action for breach of contract. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and against Defendant Maria E. Leyva in the principal sum of $20,897.32, plus reasonable attorney's fees and costs.

The Proposed Order will be signed by the Court. Plaintiff must submit a Memorandum of Costs and a declaration in support of reasonable attorney's fees as well as a Proposed Judgment for the Court's review and signature. Plaintiff to give notice.

Case Number: 25NWLC58966 Hearing Date: August 18, 2026 Dept: Y 25NWLC58966: MAERSK LOGISTICS AND SERVICES USA, INC. vs JIANGHAI AMERICA INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION Tentative Ruling: The Court has read and considered Plaintiff Maersk Logistics Services USA, Inc.'s ("Plaintiff") Motion to Set Aside Dismissal and the unsigned attorney declaration filed on May 14, 2026.

Plaintiff argues that it mistakenly filed a dismissal without prejudice to the entire action rather than a dismissal without prejudice pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Sec. 664.6. Plaintiff requests that the Court set aside the dismissal.

The motion was initially set for hearing on May 4, 2026. The Court found that Plaintiff failed to submit an agreement pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Sec. 664.6 and continued the hearing on the motion to July 9, 2026.

On July 9, 2026, the Court held a second hearing on the motion and requested that Plaintiff submit an amended motion based on Code of Civil Procedure Sec. 473.5. Plaintiff has failed to file an amended motion.