DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CPF25519472·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing todayOFF CALENDAR. This motion is premature per CCC 2924j(d). The funds have not been deposited with the Court.

IN RE: CLEAR RECON CORP

Notice Of Motion And Motion On Petition And Claim To Surplus Funds

Hearing date
Aug 31, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

OtherClear Recon Corp
PetitionerRago

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CPF25519472 - August 31, 2026 Hearing date: August 31, 2026 Case number: CPF25519472 Case title: IN RE: CLEAR RECON CORP Case Number: | | CPF25519472 | Case Title: | | IN RE: CLEAR RECON CORP | Court Date: | | 2026-08-31 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion On Petition And Claim To Surplus Funds; And Points And Authorities | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for August 31, 2026. Line 1. Claimant Rago's Motion on Petition and Claim to Surplus Funds is OFF CALENDAR.

This motion is premature per CCC 2924j(d). The funds have not been deposited with the Court. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share