DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD23671215·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 12 months agoOFF CALENDAR. Insufficient notice per Code of Civil Procedure sections 1005(b) and 1010.6.

SHAWNY K. WILLIAMS VS. SHANDA LOVE ET AL

DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER TO RELEASE FUNDS HELD IN COURT REGISTRY

Hearing date
Aug 28, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Reconsideration rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffSHAWNY K. WILLIAMS
DefendantSHANDA LOVE

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD23671215 - August 28, 2025 Hearing date: August 28, 2025 Case number: CUD23671215 Case title: SHAWNY K. WILLIAMS VS. SHANDA LOVE ET AL Case Number: | | CUD23671215 | Case Title: | | SHAWNY K. WILLIAMS VS. SHANDA LOVE ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-08-28 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER TO RELEASE FUNDS HELD IN COURT REGISTRY | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Motion calendar for August 28, 2025, line 15.

Defendants' Motion for Reconsideration of Order to Release Funds Held in Court is OFF CALENDAR. Insufficient notice per Code of Civil Procedure sections 1005(b) and 1010.6. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tent ative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share