KURT GRIMES VS. RUSHMORE LOAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC ET AL
Notice Of Motion & Motion To Compel Further Responses To Form Interrogatory 17.1 & Requests For Production Of Documents No.13, 14, 17 & 21
Motion type
Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →
Monetary amounts referenced
Parties
Ruling
Matter on the Law & Motion and Discovery Calendar for Monday, August 31, 2026, Line 7, PLAINTIFF KURT GRIMES's Motion To Compel Further Responses To Form Interrogatory 17.1 & Requests For Production Of Documents No.13, 14, 17 & 21.
Plaintiff's motion to compel further responses to discovery is continued for hearing to October 14, 2026. Plaintiff did not adequately meet and confer before filing this motion. A single letter with a demand for immediate response is not a sufficient attempt to informally resolve a discovery dispute. That the deadline to bring a motion was approaching is a problem of plaintiff's own making, and plaintiff could have requested an extension of his time to file a motion to compel in an attempt to resolve the dispute. Moreover, plaintiff does not provide a compliant separate statement, which must set out the text of a discovery response verbatim and may not summarize or characterize it.
The court exercises its discretion to permit plaintiff to cure these deficiencies. The parties are ordered to meet and confer telephonically or in person within 10 days. If disputes remain outstanding, plaintiff may file a supplemental brief with a compliant separate statement by September 30, 2026. Defendant may file a supplemental opposition by October 7, 2026.
Plaintiff's failure to meet and confer lacks substantial justification. Plaintiff shall pay partial sanctions of $1000 to defendant within 30 days of notice of entry of this order.
For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 301 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 301 Zoom ID 161 502 4290; Passcode 700956.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.
Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept301tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing. Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept301tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.
The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion or Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(301/CVA) | |
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”