DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
22CV-02709·merced·Civil·Discovery Dispute
Hearing todayGRANTED

John Dowe vs Balvir Singh, et al.

Motion to Compel Responses to Supplemental Form Interrogatories; Motion to Compel Responses to Supplemental Request for Production of Documents

Hearing date
Aug 31, 2026
Department
8
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$1,780.00$275

Parties

PlaintiffJohn K. Dowe
DefendantBalvir Singh

Ruling

22CV-02709 John Dowe vs Balvir Singh, et al.

Motion to Compel Responses to Supplemental Form Interrogatories, Set One, And for Monetary Sanctions in The Amount Of $1,780.00 Against Plaintiff, John K. Dowe

Defendant’s motion to compel responses to Supplemental Form Interrogatories, Set One, is GRANTED.

Plaintiff has failed to provide timely responses to Supplemental Form Interrogatories, Set One. Objections are waived.

Monetary sanctions are GRANTED.

Monetary sanctions in the amount of $275 are to be paid by Plaintiff within thirty (30) days of this court’s order.

Plaintiff shall serve code-compliant verified responses, without objections, within ten (10) days of the date of service of this order.

Motion to Compel Responses to Supplemental Request for Production of Documents, Set One, And for Monetary Sanctions in the Amount Of $1,780.00 Against Plaintiff, John K. Dowe

Defendant’s motion to compel responses to Supplemental Request for Production of Documents, Set One, is GRANTED.

Plaintiff has failed to provide timely responses to Supplemental Request for Production of Documents, Set One. Objections are waived.

Monetary sanctions are GRANTED.

Monetary sanctions in the amount of $275 are to be paid by Plaintiff within thirty (30) days of this court’s order.

Plaintiff shall serve code-compliant verified responses, without objections, within ten (10) days of the date of service of this order.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share