Defense Motion to Compel Further Responses to Form Interrogatories; Defense Motion to Compel Further Responses to Special Interrogatories
Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →
May 20, 2026, Law and Motion Calendar Judge Nicole S. Healy Department 28 ________________________________________________________________________
02:00 PM LINE 7 24-CIV-06638 GABRIELLE WAMPFLER VS. J STYLE AT HOME, INC., ET AL
GABRIELLE WAMPFLER ROBERT J. ANAYA J STYLE AT HOME, INC. MARYSIA S. OKREGLAK
Defense Motion to Compel Further Responses to Form Interrogatories
TENTATIVE RULING:
Defendant J Style at Home, Inc.’s unopposed “Motion to Compel Responses to Form Interrogatories, Set One, Without Objections,” filed December 31, 2025, is GRANTED.
Defendant’s December 31, 2025 Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. (Evid. Code § 452, subd. (d).)
On April 30, 2026, plaintiff filed a “Notice of Non-Opposition” to this Motion, stating that on February 26, 2026, she served responses to the Form Interrogatories. Plaintiff’s “Notice of Non-Opposition” suggests that this Motion to Compel has been rendered moot and does not require further court intervention. Plaintiff is incorrect.
Defendant’s May 12, 2026 Reply papers, which attach plaintiff’s February 26, 2026 responses (which were not attached to plaintiff’s “Notice of Non-Opposition”), demonstrate that the responses are deficient. By serving responses many months after the deadline, plaintiff has waived both the right to assert objections, and the option to produce documents in lieu of a narrative response. (Code Civ. Proc. § 2030.290, subd. (a).) Plaintiff’s February 26, 2026 responses improperly include both objections and numerous references to documents in lieu of providing a narrative response.
Within ten (10) days of notice of entry of this Order, plaintiff shall serve amended responses to the subject Form Interrogatories (Set One), without any objections (including privilege objections), which have been waived, and without exercising the option to produce documents in lieu of narrative responses, which has been waived.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the court. Thereafter, defendant’s counsel shall prepare a written order consistent with the court’s ruling for the court’s signature, pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312 and Local Rule 3.403(b)(iv), and provide written notice of the ruling to all parties who have appeared in this action. The order should be e-filed only, do not email or mail a hard copy to the court.
May 20, 2026, Law and Motion Calendar Judge Nicole S. Healy Department 28 ________________________________________________________________________
02:00 PM LINE 8 24-CIV-06638 GABRIELLE WAMPFLER VS. J STYLE AT HOME, INC., ET AL
GABRIELLE WAMPFLER ROBERT J. ANAYA J STYLE AT HOME, INC. MARYSIA S. OKREGLAK
Defense Motion to Compel Further Responses to Special Interrogatories
TENTATIVE RULING:
Defendant J Style at Home, Inc.’s unopposed “Motion to Compel Responses to Special Interrogatories, Set One, Without Objections,” filed December 31, 2025, is GRANTED.
Defendant’s December 31, 2025 Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. (Evid. Code § 452, subd. (d).)
On April 30, 2026, plaintiff filed a “Notice of Non-Opposition” to this Motion, stating that on February 26, 2026, Plaintiff served responses to the Special Interrogatories. Plaintiff’s “Notice of Non-Opposition” suggests that this Motion to Compel has been rendered moot and does not require further court intervention. Plaintiff is incorrect.
Defendant’s May 12, 2026 Reply papers, which attach plaintiff’s February 26, 2026 responses (which were not attached to plaintiff’s “Notice of Non-Opposition”), demonstrate that the responses are deficient. By serving responses many months after the deadline, plaintiff has waived both the right to assert objections, and the option to produce writings/documents in lieu of a narrative response. (Code Civ. Proc. § 2030.290, subd. (a).) Plaintiff’s February 26, 2026 responses improperly reference producing documents in lieu of providing a narrative response. (See response to SROG No. 29.)
Within ten (10) days of notice of entry of this Order, plaintiff shall serve amended responses to the subject Special Interrogatories (Set One), without objections, which have been waived, and without exercising the option to produce documents in lieu of providing a narrative response, which has been waived.
If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the court. Thereafter, defendant’s counsel shall prepare a written order consistent with the court’s ruling for the court’s signature, pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312 and Local Rule 3.403(b)(iv), and provide written notice of the ruling to all parties who have appeared in this action. The order should be e-filed only, do not email or mail a hard copy to the court.