DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25PG-0032793·shasta·Probate·Fix Residence
Hearing todayAppearance required for setting contested hearing.

Guardianship of Camden Renier

Petition to Fix Residence Outside the State of California

Hearing date
Aug 31, 2026
Department
42
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

OtherCamden Renier

Ruling

CASE NUMBER: 25PG-0032793 Disclosure Re: guardianship cases involving Shasta County Health and Human Services Agency-Judge Wood discloses that her step-daughter, Erinn Watts, is the Administrative Branch Director of the Health and Human Services Agency. In that position, Judge Wood’s step-daughter does not have any involvement in the investigation, management, prosecution or defense of guardianship cases. However, the Court makes this disclosure of an employment relationship between an investigating agency and the Court’s first degree relative as required by California Code of Judicial Ethics.

This matter is on calendar for further proceedings on a Petition to Fix Residence Outside the State of California. A new Notice of Hearing has not been filed and served for today’s date. There is no proof of service of the Notice of Hearing and Petition for the father. The Court notes that notice to the father was previously dispensed with regarding the Petition for Appointment because his full identity is unknown. Therefore, the Court also dispenses with notice to the father

regarding this Petition. The matter has been properly noticed. The mother previously filed an objection. The Court has reviewed the Court Investigator’s report filed on August 19, 2026, which recommends granting the Petition. An appearance is necessary on today’s calendar for setting of a contested hearing.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share