DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24PG-0032451·shasta·Probate·Termination of Guardianship
Hearing todayGRANTED.

Guardianship of Owen Larson

Petition for Termination of Guardianship; Petition for Fees; Approval of Distribution

Hearing date
Aug 31, 2026
Department
42
Judge
Prevailing
Moving Party
Next hearing
Oct 12, 2026
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

OtherOwen Larson

Ruling

CASE NUMBER: 24PG-0032451 Disclosure Re: guardianship cases involving Shasta County Health and Human Services Agency-Judge Wood discloses that her step-daughter, Erinn Watts, is the Administrative Branch Director of the Health and Human Services Agency. In that position, Judge Wood’s step-daughter does not have any involvement in the investigation, management, prosecution or defense of guardianship cases. However, the Court makes this disclosure of an employment relationship between an investigating agency and the Court’s first degree relative as required by California Code of Judicial Ethics.

This matter is on calendar for hearing on a Petition for Termination of Guardianship and the Second and Final Account and Report of Guardian and Petition for Fees, Approval of Distribution, and Discharge. Proof of service has been filed for all living parties. The matter has been properly noticed. No objections have been raised. The paperwork appears to be in order. The Petitions are GRANTED. Proposed Orders have been submitted and will be executed by the Court. The clerk is directed to return the original lodged statements to the submitting party. The matter is continued to Monday, October 12, 2026, at 8:30 a.m. in Department 42 for status of final distribution. No appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share