All cases
Synchrony Bank v. DiMarco
Motion for entry of judgment
Hearing date
Aug 31, 2026
Department
C1
Judge
—
Prevailing
Moving Party
Motion type
Parties
PlaintiffSynchrony Bank
DefendantDiMarco
Ruling
1. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME SYNCHRONY BANK VS MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT
DIMARCO BY SYNCHRONY BANK Tentative Ruling: Motion Granted
2. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MOTION TO SET ASIDE SETTLEMENT CVCO2504484 CITIBANK VS DIAZ ENTER JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION BY CITIBANK Tentative Ruling: Motion Granted
3. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MOTION TO ENTER JUDGMENT NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT CVCO2507084 PURSUANT TO CCP § 664.6 BY NAVY UNION VS SALLE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION Tentative Ruling: Motion Granted
Cited authorities
Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.