Bookout, Summer Leigh v. Bookout, David Michael
Status Conference
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION 09/04/2026, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0004203 Petitioner: Bookout, Summer Leigh Attorney: Self-Represented Respondent: Bookout, David Michael Attorney: Self-Represented
1. Status Conference is continued to Friday, 03/05/2027, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 03/02/2027. Any forms listed in item 2 below shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 03/05/2027. Item 3 Judgment forms are not on this schedule. Those shall be filed when a Judgment is ready to be submitted. That is usually when a written agreement has been reached.
2. The Court notes that the following are still required: Proof of Service / Response or Default a. FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons OR request from Petitioner for additional time to serve documents OR CIV-110 Request for Dismissal if Petitioner no longer wants to proceed. b. Proof of Service has not been received. When it has been at least 30 days since the Summons and Petition were served on Respondent, one of the following: i. FL-120 Response and FL-141 Dec. re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR ii. Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. Preliminary Declarations of Disclosure c. FL-141 Dec. re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.
3. The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference. __________________________________________________________________
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”