Status Conference
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION 07/10/2026, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0003960 Petitioner: Brokenshire, Savannah Attorney: Self-Represented Respondent: Taylor, Dillon Attorney: Self-Represented
1. Status Conference is continued to 01/08/2027, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 01/05/2027.
OR Both parties are represented by an attorney. No appearance by parties or counsel is necessary at this Status Conference. The Court presumes that no further Status Conference is necessary at this time. The matter may be restored to the Status Conference at the request of either party or by notice from the Court. OR This is the third status conference. Personal appearance is required. No continuance is contemplated by the Court at this time. If Petitioner does not appear at the status conference, the case will be dropped from further Status Conference review. OR This case is set for trial in Department 5. Further status conference in Department 3 is vacated. Your appearance is not required at the status conference date stated above.
2. The Court notes that the following are still required: a. FL-105 Declaration Under Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA) from Respondent. b. FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner. c. FL-141 Declaration re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent.
3. The required forms shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 01/08/2027, the next Status Conference date stated in item 1.
4. The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”