CHINCHILLA vs LEMIEUX
MOTION TO VACATE (DISMISSAL 02-26-26)
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
1. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME E.I.M. & T. SUPERIOR DATA RESOURCES CVRI2404496 MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC vs TINA Tentative Ruling:
DENY
While there is commonality of issues, parties and claims in both actions, the existence of a premises liability personal injury claim in the Tina Cross-Complaint renders consolidation impracticable. The cases will instead be designated as related actions.
2. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MOTION TO VACATE (DISMISSAL CVRI2406213 CHINCHILLA vs LEMIEUX 02-26-26) Tentative Ruling:
GRANT
The Dismissal of February 23, 2026 is set aside. Matter is returned to the civil active list.
The Court sets an Order to Show Cause Re: Why the action should not be dismissed for failure to file proof of service of the Complaint on the Defendant pursuant to CRC 3.110(b & f), to be heard on October 29, 2026, at 8:30am in Department 4.
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”