DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CVRI2505586·riverside·Civil·Civil
Hearing todayAppearances requested

329894 vs COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE

Demurrer

Hearing date
Aug 28, 2026
Department
1
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Parties

Plaintiff329894
DefendantCounty of Riverside

Ruling

3. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME 329894 vs COUNTY OF CVRI2505586 DEMURRER ON COMPLAINT RIVERSIDE Tentative Ruling: Appearances requested to discuss the applicability/interpretation of Government Code § 844.6.

4. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME 329894 vs COUNTY OF CVRI2505586 MOTION TO STRIKE COMPLAINT RIVERSIDE Tentative Ruling: No tentative ruling.

5. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME ROE vs COUNTY OF DEMURRER ON 1ST AMENDED CVRI2507395 RIVERSIDE COMPLAINT Tentative Ruling: Appearances requested to discuss the applicability/interpretation of Government Code § 844.6.

6. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME ROE vs COUNTY OF MOTION TO STRIKE 1ST AMENDED CVRI2507395 RIVERSIDE COMPLAINT Tentative Ruling: No tentative ruling.

7. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME ROE vs COUNTY OF DEMURRER ON 1ST AMENDED CVRI2602118 RIVERSIDE COMPLAINT Tentative Ruling: Appearances requested; register of actions does not reflect filing of opposition papers.

8. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME ROE vs COUNTY OF MOTION TO STRIKE 1ST AMENDED CVRI2602118 RIVERSIDE COMPLAINT Tentative Ruling: Appearances requested; register of actions does not reflect filing of opposition papers.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share