DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC24614383·sf·Civil·Discovery Dispute
Hearing 10 months agoDENIED

DAVID GUTEKUNST VS. LINDSAY BRENNAN ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion For Issue, Evidentiary, And Monetary Sanctions For Failure To Obey Court Order Compelling Discovery Responses

Hearing date
Oct 10, 2025
Department
301
Judge
Prevailing
Opposing Party

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Sanctions rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffDAVID GUTEKUNST
DefendantLINDSAY BRENNAN
DefendantCHRIS TAVELLI

Ruling

Matter on the Law & Motion / Discovery calendar for Friday, October 10, 2025, Line 6. CROSS COMPLAINANT LINDSAY BRENNAN, AND CHRIS TAVELLI's Motion For Issue, Evidentiary, And Monetary Sanctions For Failure To Obey Court Order Compelling Discovery Responses.

Defendant Lindsay Brennan's motion for issue, evidentiary and monetary sanctions is denied without prejudice to re-filing the motion if Plaintiff David Gutenkunst does not fully comply with the August 5, 2025 order by October 30, 2025 and Brennan submits evidence establishing that she has been prejudiced by Gutenkunst's failure to fully comply with the August 5 order.

Notwithstanding the deplorable failure by Gunenkunst to respond to discovery served about ten months ago, Brennan has not presented evidence that she has been prejudiced by Gutenkunst's ignoring his discovery obligatons. Nor can prejudice be presumed because trial is still about eight months away. Absent evidence of prejudice, there is no basis to award issue or evidentiary sanctions. Since there is no basis to award non-monetary sanctions, this motion was not reasonably necessary because Gutenkunst remains obligated to comply with the August 5 order and thus monetary sanctions for the cost of filing the motion are also denied.

Gutenkunst's request for 20 days to respond to the discovery is a strong indication that he can do so. As the case gets closer to trial, failure to do so risks serious consequences for Gutenkunst.

For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 301 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 301 Zoom ID 161 502 4290; Passcode 700956.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.

Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept301tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.

Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept301tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.

The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion or Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(301/HEK) | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share