DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC23606966·sf·Civil·Discovery Dispute
Hearing about 1 year agoDENIED

MARIA FRANCESCA SULAIMANI VS. HILARY PASSMAN ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion To Compel Discovery Responses And For Monetary Sanctions

Hearing date
Aug 14, 2025
Department
302
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Discovery rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$2,760

Parties

PlaintiffMaria Francesca Sulaimani
DefendantHilary Passman
DefendantDevil's Teeth, Inc.

Attorneys

Grainne Callanfor Plaintiff

Ruling

Set for Law and Motion/Discovery Calendar on Thursday, August 14, 2025, Line 3. PLAINTIFF MARIA SULAIMANI's Motion To Compel Discovery Responses And For Monetary Sanctions.

Plaintiff Maria Francesca Sulaimani's motion to compel further responses to requests for production 59, 65, 67, 69, 71-75, 83, 84, 85, 86. 89, 90, 92 is denied. Plaintiff failed to provide a separate statement or concise outline, which is a mandatory requirement. (Code of Civil Procedure section 2031.310(b)(3); California Rules of Court, rule 3.1345(a).) Indeed, Plaintiff failed to provide a copy of her requests for production and Defendant's responses so the court has no way to analyze this discovery dispute. Defendant's attempt to respond to the merits of Plaintiff's motion and Plaintiff's untimely reply separate statement does not cure the defect.

Plaintiff failed to act with substantial justification. Plaintiff Maria Francesca Sulaimani shall pay $2,760 to Defendants Hilary Passman and Devil's Teeth, Inc. as sanctions by August 28, 2025. (See Code of Civil Procedure sections 2023.010, 2023.030 & 2031.310(h).)

For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 302 Zoom ID 160 409 7690; Passcode 516287.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.

Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.

Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept302tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.

The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/JMQ) | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share