SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. v. MARIN ADVANCED WOUND CENTER PC
MOTION – LEAVE – AMEND COMPLAINT
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend the Complaint was filed on June 29, 2026. Defendant filed a timely opposition on August 17, 2026.
A motion to amend a pleading before trial must include a copy of the proposed amendment or amended pleading, which must be appropriately numbered, here as the First Amendment Complaint. Rule of Court, Rule 3.1324(a)(1). The moving party must state the allegations to be added, and identify by page, paragraph and line number, and where additional allegations are located. Rule 3.1324(a)(3). The party must file a declaration specifying the effect of the amendment, why the amendment is necessary and proper, when the facts giving rise to the amendment where discovered, and the reasons why the requested amendment was not made earlier. Rule 3.1324(b).
Plaintiff has not filed a proposed amended complaint, nor was the motion supported by a declaration, as required. The motion to amend is DENIED without prejudice. Defendant should note that if the Plaintiff complies with the rules of court, the request will likely be GRANTED, given the scope of the proposed amendment is limited. The parties should meet and confer prior to any future refiling in an effort to achieve a stipulation.
Parties must comply with Marin County Superior Court Local Rules, Rule 2.10(A), (B), which provides that if a party wants to present oral argument, the party must contact the Court at (415) 444- 7046 and all opposing parties by 4:00 p.m. the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. Notice may be by telephone or in person to all other parties that argument is being requested (i.e., it is not necessary to speak with counsel or parties directly.) Unless the Court and all parties have been notified of a request to present oral argument, no oral argument will be permitted except by order of the Court. In the event no party requests oral argument in accordance with Rule 2.10(B), the tentative ruling shall become the order of the court.
IT IS ORDERED that evidentiary hearings shall be in-person in Department L. For routine appearances, the parties may access Department L for video conference via a link on the court website. Kindly turn your camera on when your case is called and make sure the party or lawyer making the appearance is properly identified on the screen.
FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are responsible for ensuring that they have a good connection and that they are available for the hearing while using the virtual remote courtroom. If the connection is inadequate, the Court may proceed with the hearing in the party’s absence. If it is determined that you are diving your car during the hearing, you will be removed from the virtual courtroom. (Yes, this happens).
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”