DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26CV00556·santacruz·Civil·Civil
Hearing about 2 months agoDENIED

EISENBERG v. SUTTER HEALTH

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Jul 15, 2026
Department
Judge
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffEISENBERG
DefendantSUTTER HEALTH

Ruling

LAW AND MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DATE: JULY 15, 2026 TIME: 8:30 A.M.

The motion is granted. Plaintiff is directed to file his proposed first amended complaint within 10 days. Defendant shall file a responsive pleading within 30 days from the date the cross-complaint is filed.

No. 26CV00556

EISENBERG v. SUTTER HEALTH

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

The motion is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff failed to attach a copy of the proposed first amended complaint as required. [See, Cal. Rules of Court, rule 31324(a) "A motion to amend a pleading before trial must: (1) Include a copy of the proposed amendment or amended pleading, which must be serially numbered to differentiate it from previous pleadings or amendments.”]

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share