VIDA LARA; ET AL. vs. WINNRESIDENTIAL CALIFORNIA, LP.
Motion by Plaintiffs to Compel Further Responses from Defendant LLAM to Requests for Admissions 1, 2, and 5-7; Motion by Plaintiffs to Compel Further Responses from Defendant WINNRESIDENTIAL to Requests for Admissions 4 and 5; Motion by Plaintiffs to Compel Further Responses from Defendant WINNRESIDENTIAL to Requests for Production 10-13, 15-16, 23-29 and 34; Motion by Plaintiffs to Compel Further Responses from Defendant LLAM to Special Interrogatories 6 and 7; Motion by Plaintiffs to Compel Further Responses from Defendant WINNRESIDENTIAL to Special Interrogatories 14, and 16-23
Motion type
Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →
Parties
Ruling
Case No. CU25-06641
1). Motion by Plaintiffs to Compel Further Responses from Defendant LLAM to Requests for Admissions 1, 2, and 5-7;
2). Motion by Plaintiffs to Compel Further Responses from Defendant WINNRESIDENTIAL to Requests for Admissions 4 and 5;
3). Motion by Plaintiffs to Compel Further Responses from Defendant WINNRESIDENTIAL to Requests for Production 10-13, 15-16, 23-29 and 34;
4). Motion by Plaintiffs to Compel Further Responses from Defendant LLAM to Special Interrogatories 6 and 7; and
5). Motion by Plaintiffs to Compel Further Responses from Defendant WINNRESIDENTIAL to Special Interrogatories 14, and 16-23
THE PARTIES ARE TO APPEAR.
RUBY EVANS vs. WINDSOR VALLEJO CARE; ET AL.
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”