| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
Notice Of Motion, Motion For Admissions To Be Deemed Admitted, Motion To Compel Discovery Responses, Request For Sanctions
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25679679 - December 19, 2025 Hearing date: December 19, 2025 Case number: CUD25679679 Case title: MARGARET EIDT VS. MOHAMMED ROLAND ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25679679 | Case Title: | | MARGARET EIDT VS. MOHAMMED ROLAND ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-12-19 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion, Motion For Admissions To Be Deemed Admitted, Motion To Compel Discovery Responses, Request For Sanctions | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for December 19, 2025 line 13.
DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DEEM ADMISSIONS ADMITTED is GRANTED in part, subject to opposition. Plaintiff shall serve complete verified responses without objection to Defendant's Form Interrogatories-Unlawful Detainer (Set One); Form Interrogatories-General (Set One); and Request for Production of Documents (Set One) within 5 days of notice of entry of order. Truth of all matters in the Requests for Admission (Set One) are deemed admitted. Sanctions granted in the amount of $1,750 only. =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom [Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252]. Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”