DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD25679463·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing 9 months agoGRANTED

CRESCENT MANOR PARTNERS, LP VS. WILLIAM ROGERS ET AL

MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT/DEFAULT JUDGMENT/LEAVE TO DEFEND

Hearing date
Dec 2, 2025
Department
501
Judge
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffCRESCENT MANOR PARTNERS, LP
DefendantWILLIAM ROGERS AKA WILLIAM F. ROGERS

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25679463 - December 2, 2025 Hearing date: December 2, 2025 Case number: CUD25679463 Case title: CRESCENT MANOR PARTNERS, LP VS. WILLIAM ROGERS ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25679463 | Case Title: | | CRESCENT MANOR PARTNERS, LP VS. WILLIAM ROGERS ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-12-02 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT/DEFAULT JUDGMENT/LEAVE TO DEFEND | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for December 2, 2025. Line 8.

DEFENDANT WILLIAM ROGERS AKA WILLIAM F. ROGERS MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT/DEFAULT JUDGMENT/LEAVE TO DEFEND is GRANTED, subject to opposition. Defendant to file an answer forthwith. =(501/AAT)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share