DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD26682371·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing todayGRANTED

MEREDIAN MANAGEMENT GROUP VS. CHARLES GLIDE ET AL

Motion to Vacate Default and Judgment

Hearing date
Aug 18, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

DefendantCHARLES GLIDE
DefendantCHARLES GUDE
PlaintiffMEREDIAN MANAGEMENT GROUP

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD26682371 - August 18, 2026 Hearing date: August 18, 2026 Case number: CUD26682371 Case title: MEREDIAN MANAGEMENT GROUP VS. CHARLES GLIDE ET AL Case Number: | | CUD26682371 | Case Title: | | MEREDIAN MANAGEMENT GROUP VS. CHARLES GLIDE ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-08-18 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion, Motion, Memorandum Of Points And Autorities And Declaration In Support Of Motion To Vacate Default And Judgment | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for August 18, 2026. Line 10.

Defendant Gude's Motion to Vacate Default and Judgment is GRANTED. Plaintiff filed a Memorandum in Support of Defendant's Motion. The default and default judgment entered on July 27, 2026 are set aside and vacated. The writ issued on July 31, 2026 is recalled. Defendant Charles Gude (sued as Charles Glide) shall file and serve the proposed answer within five days.=(501/SKF)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share