REXEL USA, INC. v. McGRATH

LAW AND MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DATE: AUGUST 27, 2026 TIME: 8:30 A.M.

TENTATIVE RULINGS ARE NOT POSTED IN UNLAWFUL DETAINER CASES

Notice to prevailing parties: Local Rule 2.10.01 requires you to submit a proposed formal order incorporating, verbatim, the language of any tentative ruling – or attaching and incorporating the tentative by reference - or an order consistent with the announced ruling of the Court, in accordance with California Rule of Court 3.1312. Such proposed order is required even if the prevailing party submitted a proposed order prior to the hearing with two exceptions: (1) in unopposed matters where the moving party has provided a detailed proposed order or JCC form of order, or (2) where the tentative is simply to “grant”. Failure to comply with Local Rule 2.10.01 may result in the imposition of sanctions following an order to show cause hearing, if a proposed order is not timely filed.

No. 24CV01708

REXEL USA, INC. v. McGRATH

MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL

The unopposed motion to be relieved is granted. If there is no opposition to the tentative, the Court will sign the proposed order submitted by counsel. Once the order is signed, counsel is directed to serve copies of the signed order, with the next hearing date, on McGrath Electric, Inc. and separately upon Eric McGrath and Adell McGrath as individual defendants, also transmitting the order to every known McGrath email address, with the service proof evidencing same, e-filed into the court docket.

No. 25CV02148

GARCIA v. LITTLE CAESAR’S OF SANTA CRUZ INC.

(UNOPPOSED) PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ORDER GRANTING RELIEF FROM WAIVER OF JURY TRIAL

The unopposed motion is granted.

“If a party has waived the right to a jury trial under section 631, subdivision (g) of that statute gives the trial court discretion to grant relief from such waiver: ‘The court may, in its discretion upon just terms, allow a trial by jury although there may have been a waiver of a trial by jury.’ ‘In exercising its discretion, the trial court may consider delay in rescheduling jury trial, lack of funds, timeliness of the request and prejudice to the